ARTES Database
Archive and Repository of Texts and Statutes
Collections
Accessus ad Martini Daci Modos significandi
- There are doubts about the attribution of the work to Gentilis de Cingulo. Grabmann (1941: 30-34, 54-63; 1946: 271), who published the prologue, is convinced that it is the work of Gentilis de Cingulo, as are Roos (1952: 31) and subsequently Glorieux (1971:139). Pinborg (1964: 221, n3) instead rejects the attribution. See also in this regard the considerations in Martorelli Vico 1985: xv-xviii.
- As Roos (1951: 31) notes, the commentary is incomplete.
Studies:
- Glorieux, P., La faculté des artes et ses maîtres au XIIIe siècle, Paris 1971
- Grabmann, M., L’Aristotelismo Italiano al tempo di Dante con particolare riguardo all’Università di Bologna, “Rivista di Filosofia Neo-Scolastica” 38, 1946
- Hissette, R., Note sur Gentile da Cingoli”, “Recherches de théologie ancienne et médiévale” 66, 1979
- Martorelli Vico, R. ed., Quaestiones supra Prisciano minori, Pisa 1985
- Roos, H., Die Modi significandi des Martinus de Dacia Forschungen zur Geschichte, Münster-Westf-Kopenhagen, 1952
- Pinborg, J., Eine neue sprachlogische Schrift des Simon de Dacia, in “Scholastik” 39, 1964
Editions:
- Grabmann, M., Gentile da Cingoli, ein italienischer Aristotelesaufklärer aus der Zeit Dantes. München 1941
Scribitur ab Aristotele in tertio de anima: anima est quodam modo omnia […]
[…] sed modus per se.
Matteo Stettler